Sarah Palin Shattered the Glass Ceiling on 9/3/08
Until the day I die, I will remember a sprint relay race I saw in Laredo, Texas, when I was just 10-years old. In the small schools division, Lampasas High School trailed badly after 3 legs. The batons were handed to the anchors. Ten seconds later – I don’t doubt but that it might have been 9 seconds later – other runners crossed the finish line far behind Lampasas High’s Johnny Jones. My brother, my dad and I knew that we had just seen greased lightning. But, no human being alive, much less a high school kid from Lampasas, Texas, could run as fast as we just saw Johnny Jones run. It had to be an illusion. He must be fast, but those other small school runners must have been really slow.
Two months later, in a larger venue in Montreal, Quebec, 18-year old Johnny Jones won an Olympic gold medal as a member of the United States sprint relay team. A few months after that, he ran a world record time that would have stood untouched for the next 15 years, but for a glitch in the official timing system. We had seen greased lightning in Laredo, Texas.
Last night I saw greased lightning in St. Paul, Minnesota. I will remember that powerhouse speech as long as I live. With her first “hello,” Sarah Palin transformed the highest stakes, hardest fought contest in the world. But, I think something even bigger happened last night. The glass ceiling shattered.
At times, the vanguard of a movement stands in the way of the movement. With a fundamentally misogynistic perspective, Womyn’s rights groups lately have been guarding the glass ceiling. Listen to the vile contempt Sarah Palin faces from them. The elitist, yapping class derisively tells Sarah Palin that she belongs in the kitchen, that she – and all women like her – have no business trying to perform in this man’s world. Without apology or equivocation, the professional womyn’s movement broadcasts that most women (all non-liberal women) are to be held in contempt as dull, backwards creatures. Sarah Palin, as seems to be her way, just cut straight through that nonsense. She questioned whether it should be a man’s world and answered her own question with an emphatic, but distinctly feminine, “No.”
Sen. Obama apparently commented today, “I assume that she wants to be treated the same way that guys want to be treated.” Wrong. That’s the pre-Palin, misogynistic view that it is a man’s world – with female participants and female fellow travelers. It is the view that a woman must choose between the sidelines of the man’s world or forfeit something to enter the man’s world and, then, be treated like a man. Sarah Palin made the solid case that women are not guests or pretenders in a man’s world. Sarah Palin has changed the rules. She is a woman, she doesn’t need anyone else’s permission or approval for her choices, and everyone else had better deal with it. She expects to be treated like a woman. Liberals’ confusion comes from their belief that “woman” is synonymous with inferior, less capable and victim.
UPDATE: This, as the article describes, is the woman that womyn are saying is not qualified. Please, someone tell me anything that Sen. Obama has ever done in office to compare with it. You simply can't.
Two months later, in a larger venue in Montreal, Quebec, 18-year old Johnny Jones won an Olympic gold medal as a member of the United States sprint relay team. A few months after that, he ran a world record time that would have stood untouched for the next 15 years, but for a glitch in the official timing system. We had seen greased lightning in Laredo, Texas.
Last night I saw greased lightning in St. Paul, Minnesota. I will remember that powerhouse speech as long as I live. With her first “hello,” Sarah Palin transformed the highest stakes, hardest fought contest in the world. But, I think something even bigger happened last night. The glass ceiling shattered.
At times, the vanguard of a movement stands in the way of the movement. With a fundamentally misogynistic perspective, Womyn’s rights groups lately have been guarding the glass ceiling. Listen to the vile contempt Sarah Palin faces from them. The elitist, yapping class derisively tells Sarah Palin that she belongs in the kitchen, that she – and all women like her – have no business trying to perform in this man’s world. Without apology or equivocation, the professional womyn’s movement broadcasts that most women (all non-liberal women) are to be held in contempt as dull, backwards creatures. Sarah Palin, as seems to be her way, just cut straight through that nonsense. She questioned whether it should be a man’s world and answered her own question with an emphatic, but distinctly feminine, “No.”
Sen. Obama apparently commented today, “I assume that she wants to be treated the same way that guys want to be treated.” Wrong. That’s the pre-Palin, misogynistic view that it is a man’s world – with female participants and female fellow travelers. It is the view that a woman must choose between the sidelines of the man’s world or forfeit something to enter the man’s world and, then, be treated like a man. Sarah Palin made the solid case that women are not guests or pretenders in a man’s world. Sarah Palin has changed the rules. She is a woman, she doesn’t need anyone else’s permission or approval for her choices, and everyone else had better deal with it. She expects to be treated like a woman. Liberals’ confusion comes from their belief that “woman” is synonymous with inferior, less capable and victim.
UPDATE: This, as the article describes, is the woman that womyn are saying is not qualified. Please, someone tell me anything that Sen. Obama has ever done in office to compare with it. You simply can't.

Subscribe

15 Comments:
wasn't that glass ceiling shattered 24 years ago?
Sarah Palin shattered the glass ceiling, attaining the highest office possible for a woman in the United States of America...The Republican Vice Presidential Nomination...Inspiring.
If only the libs could get with the times.
Craig41,
I don't think so. The womyn's movement is actually adverse to most women. If they don't have the right degrees of jobs, the womyn's movement treats them poorly and sends the message that they should be treated poorly. Sarah Palin represents the other women.
Salem,
Again, your point is?
"“woman” is synonymous with inferior, less capable and victim." That seems to me to be a straw-man argument. I think we should be fair and consistent with Palin. We should look at her record as Mayor and Governor with the same scrutiny that one looks at Obama's associations with people who make caucasian-americans uncomfortable. It is only fair, since to do otherwise, would be to treat her with kid-gloves and therefore assume she is inferior because she is a woman.
Personally, I welcome that scrutiny. If she truly was banning books as mayor, imploring God through prayers for a gas pipeline, and being a proponent of the bridge to nowhere, before she was an opponent to the bridge to nowhere, I think it is fair to point that out. If she claims to want to reform Washington from special interests, we should explore how she as Governor and Mayor handled those interests.
And I am confident that the American people will not treat such scrutiny as some sort of sexism, designed to treat her differently because she is a woman.
Obi Wan,
I agree with much of what you write. She is vying for a very important job, and she should be scrutinized carefully. Bring the heat; she has to stand up to it. In no way am I saying she needs protection or kid gloves. Quite to the contrary, I believe that Americans are pretty smart and that cheap shots will push voters to her. However, I do value good discourse -- as it is obvious you do, too. I'm saying the discourse should be above board.
Let's cut the chatter that she should be home with the kids. That's not our business. Yet, it has been all over the media, including the WaPo and NYT. It is coming from prominent "feminists." It would never be said about a man. As I claim in this post, I think it now will be said less often about all women.
Also, though I think she put this one squarely to bed, let's recognize that she is a governor. It's very fair to question the depth and length of her service, but I think that people were making fools of themselves wanting to peg her as nothing more than a beauty queen or a hick town mayor. Women should not be shackled to their former status. Once they move on, men aren't regarded as the frat boys lushes or bank tellers they once were. Women too often are.
I deeply respect Sen. Obama and the journey he is on. I hope that shows in my posts.
http://steveu.com/blog/2007/07/darn-that-barack-obama.html
http://steveu.com/blog/2007/07/obama-and-merit-pay-for-teachers.html#comments
I now seriously question his willingness to square up to tough issues and take on the yucks in his party. But, I hope I am succeeding in addressing his candidacy on the merits and not sideshows.
You'll note that I've never talk about his family or his religious practices. At least that's one lure that I think never catches my eye.
My point is to be sarcastic. I'm not sure what glass ceiling was shattered by her. She is not the first woman VP nominee.
I'm no Democrat, but adding Palin to the ticket has solved none of my concerns with a McCain Administration.
I'm amazed how much the GOP is fawning over a woman VP. It's like you all have never considered that a woman could even be capable of holding a higher office. You act like this is ground breaking news and it's not. My point was sarcasm.
Geraldine Ferraro, you silly revisionist, you, broke this particular ceiling a LONG time ago.
I can't tell you how adorable it is to see you guys pretend to not care that Romney got the shaft, here.
JM,
If Ferraro broke the glass ceiling, why are the libs so insistent that Sarah Palin and women like her stay in the kitchen?
I'm not talking about simply being on the ticket. Of course, Ferraro first did that -- on a ticket that got no bounce. I'm talking about changing culture, so that it won't be a man's game, where women will be treated "like one of the guys."
Sarah Palin has the signs that she could be a game changer. It seems that a lot of women and men sense the same thing. And the old schoolers like Gloria Steinem are scared to death that individual women might be empowered and the old schoolers' group power base will be disbursed.
Steve-
I think its pretty telling that you have written 3 or 4 posts about the vice president nomination and not a single post about that dude who would be president.
I'm not sure people are going to go out of their way to vote for a vice president, when some of us aren't even sure what the vice president does every day.
That's why the Republicans are going aren't going to win this thing, well that and the last eight years.
Look, I guess I can understand your giddiness and convention related amnesia about Palin.
All I see, once I get past the Mary-Ann from Gilligan's Island vibe I get from her (a compliment, even if I did think that Ginger was the hotter of the two) is another Republican shrouded in scandals.
Aside from the lies about the bridge to nowhere, the Anchorage Daily News is now asking Sarah Palin to stop stonewalling the ethics investigation probing her firing of the state's Commissioner of Public Safety.
Just because you didn't take Ferraro seriously, doesn't mean that her nomination wasn't serious. Just as I can't take Palin seriously doesn't mean that she's not a break through for the Republican Party, 20+ years after the Dems did it.
I'm happy that you're happy. I hope that, come November, the next 60 days of smiles carry you contentedly through the next 8 years of the Obama Administration.
:)
Steve, your obtuse nature never ceases to amaze me.
Suddenly Palin is the first woman to seek high office? Did you miss the primaries? No TeeVee down there? What? You're propping her up this way is disingenuous, at best.
There is nothing sexist about calling into question her credibility. Personally, I'm glad McCain chose her, because it puts a stop to all the "experience" talk (you cannot, for a second, imply with any credibility that her experience rivals that of Obama... McCain's experience, yes, Palin's? It is to laugh).
And brokering a deal for BP as the wife of one of BP's top process managers is groudbreaking how?
Palin's record is middle brow. And it was a foolish choice on McCain's part strategically, when he had so many other, more experienced, more viable female Republicans to choose from at the federal level. This choice represents misogyny alright, but it is on the part of the people advising McCain that "any woman will do." He really just didn't get it.
On the other hand, I was saddened that Romney wasn't the pick, because he was great fodder for bloggers, and often made me laugh. Palin brings the humor back into online commentary, and for that, I welcome her nomination.
For those not willing to rely entirely on Steve's wonderously informed insight: http://tiny.cc/FactCheckingPalin
Typical liberal response, JM, talking about Ginger and Mary Ann, when any Repub could tell you that Lovie Howell was the real dreamgirl.
Typical Republican rejoinder, Rep. U, always finding money more attractive than women.
hee hee
Was the glass ceiling really shattered 24 years ago?(or by Palin)Voters not only said no to the idea of VP Ferraro, they said hell no. Voters may very well do the same with Palin -- the media sure seems to think that this will be the case.
For semantics, I'd argue Ferraro was a rock chip in the glass ceiling. Palin is another rock chip, that may very well shatter the ceiling in November.
To be honest, I'm just bored and wasting time.
Have a good time.
As we were watching Sarah Palin's speech, my wife, who is very much not a political person, said, "She and her family just seem like normal people". Sarah Palin's appeal to "normal people" / middle America (especially us bitter small town ones who cling to our guns and religion) is clearly giving the San Fran-New York-Chicago-DC elites fits, including the media who is so obviously in the tank for Obama. They just don't get it.
I especially enjoyed Sarah's response to the Obama campaign's "small-town mayor" statement - we small town folk generally don't like patronizing big city liberals who think themselves much more enlightened talking down to us. That's why I literally laughed out loud when I read the threats from Cliff "Please Hammer Don't Hurt 'Em" Lyon. I'd never heard of or visited oneutah, but thought I'd take a gander. And what's the headline I first see? "Doomed by the Bell Curve: Why Democrats Can’t Compete", including this quote, "if the Republicans have the bottom half of the bell curve to themselves, how can a Democrat hope to compete?.....Sarah Palin, if history is any indication, you could well be our next great Republican president. All the indicators are there, and you have the best backing in the world."
I'm not from St. George, but I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that that elitist attitude would not play very well in St. George were Cliff to carry out his "Hammer" threats.
Post a Comment
<< Home