Monday, May 19, 2008

Improving Public Education

The toughest thing to do in a political arena is to move away from the status quo. Nowhere is this more true than public education. Yet, twenty percent (20%) of Utah’s graduating seniors this year did not pass the basic skills test (a simple test). That poor result comes, despite the fact that each student gets 5 shots at the test, starting at the end of the sophomore year; and, despite the fact that remediation money specifically was provided for students who had failed parts of the test 3 times.

Twenty percent. One-fifth of all students (who haven’t already dropped out). And, compared to the rest of the nation, these are very teachable students. This is a crisis of the first order.

Part of the problem is funding. Utah has two significant challenges. First, Utah has more school kids per taxpayer than any other state. Second, Utah has less land on the tax rolls than any state, except Alaska and Nevada. Still, we need to secure more funding for our schools (by growing our economy). Over the last 4 years, the Legislature has increased public education funding in Utah by 40%. That’s a good start, but we still have much more to do.

But, despite protestations to the contrary, funding isn’t the only issue. All areas of government, including public education, could do better through increased innovation, reform and accountability. However, the dialogue on public education is highly, if not completely, politicized. As a result, not surprisingly, Utah is more dysfunctional on education policy than any other subject – stifling innovation, reform and accountability.

In a quest for better dialogue, I am pulling together a local group of 15 people to discuss K-12 education issues on an on-going basis. I've invited 9 educators/administrators and 6 parents. I am hopeful that good ideas will emerge.

18 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funding is the ONLY issue.

Increasing education spending is worthy goal even if "performance" is not improved. Increased spending is not just an means. It's an end.

1:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The solution is simple: more funding.

Give education more money, and we'll spend more money.

1:11 PM  
Blogger Jesse Harris said...

I think that a key component of improvement is to start looking at the countries that are beating us and figure out why. If we're getting served by Singapore, we should figure out what they're doing right and adapt it for our own uses. That's where US education policy is seriously falling flat.

4:57 PM  
Blogger Barbara said...

What does it really mean that 20% didn't pass UBSCT? A thorough breakdown of that statistic is needed before any conclusions are made. Is it 20% of every school district? Did these students receive passing grades in course work? What part of the 20% are receiving special services due to an IEP? What part of this group took advantage of the remediation and tutoring offered? What are the attendance rates of these students? What is the best way to help these students prepare for the future? These are just a few issues that come to mind but I would want much more information.

Education policy falls flat because the stakeholders have yet to agree on what success looks like. Some policymakers seem to want every high school graduate prepared to attend college. Is that appropriate? Is it realistic? Is it what every parent and student call success? I agree for the need for dialogue. I hope your parent invitees are as diverse as my neighbors and bring many of the differing points of view to your table. I look forward to hearing about the results

6:27 PM  
Anonymous David said...

We need good ideas on how to improve education, and we also need good ideas on how to improve the public dialog surrounding the subject.

I look forward to hearing any good ideas that come from your group.

9:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would suggest two things. First the 20% says more about that 20% and their parents than it does about the schools. Second that one of the biggest problems with teachers in public education is in the colleges of education and their total "constructivist" philosophy.

7:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Steve, along the lines of Barbara’s comment, I would submit that your apparent question is somewhat simplistic. I normally don’t like to make things more complicated but sometimes too simple doesn’t help.

Allow me, please, to rephrase your question: What can/should we do about the three categories of students within the 20 percent that did not pass the exit exam?

One group (I’m told it is about half of those not passing or 10 percent of all students) are UNABLE to pass the test. They have some sort of disability that makes it virtually impossible for them to pass the test. For these students, we should provide all of the help we reasonably can then allow them some kind of alternative way to show their accomplishments.

The remaining portion, I believe, can be divided into students who are UNWILLING to pass the test and students who the system failed. I have no idea what the breakdown here would be. I also don’t know where to place the ESL students. What is clear, is that some of the students don’t put out the amount of effort required to be successful. For these students, no amount of money will make them pass the test. From a purely economic standpoint, we should send them away and tell them to return when they are willing.

This leaves the students who were failed by the system. For these students, remediation can help but the real thing we need to do is find the place where the system failed and fix it. It occurs to me that we could use our new student numbering system and technology to trace their history and find the problems.

Just a few thoughts.

9:08 AM  
Anonymous Steve Kroes said...

Steve,

Thanks for taking on the issues of funding and reform. We definitely need better dialogue on how to improve education, and it's good to see you taking it seriously in your district. I'm not sure if the 20% failure on UBSCT is that alarming, as has been mentioned by other commenters (it would be useful to see how many are special ed kids, and so on). Maybe with more info, it may turn out to be alarming, but at this point, I can't tell. Anyway, best of luck with your local effort to study problems with public education. I hope you keep it up, and I'll be interested to hear what you find in this process.

9:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another part of the ubsct problem is children who move into the system late in their school career. Their instruction may not correlate from state to state, and they only have three chances to pass ubsct. If they move in their senior year, have trouble passing the test and then run out of time before being able to retake the test, the mandate is that they still be given the alternate diploma. Yet, they tried to take the test and simply ran out of time before being able to retake it or receive tutoring help. Then, they are branded with the alternate diploma through no fault of their own. There needs to be a provision in the law to accommodate transferring students.

2:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"And, compared to the rest of the nation, these are very teachable students."
Can you explain what you meant by this statement?

5:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Utah does not have a funding problem. We spend over $7500 per student each year. The problem is that we continue to look for expensive ways to provide education along with taxpayer-subsidized daycare with many parents who don't care about what their kids do in school.

8:28 PM  
Blogger Cameron said...

Part of the problem is funding. Utah has two significant challenges. First, Utah has more school kids per taxpayer than any other state. Second, Utah has less land on the tax rolls than any state, except Alaska and Nevada.

Wow.

10:17 AM  
Anonymous Jon said...

I just have to laugh (very hard) at the first anonymous comment that "funding is the ONLY issue. Increasing education spending is (a) worthy goal even if perforance is not improved."

Oh my gosh, you're kidding, right? Funding is NOT the only issue, and it's not "worthy" to simply throw money at education regardless of the outcome achieved!

Effective, efficient education is the issue! Yes, we need to put more money into education, but not without accountability! And not without assessment and even strings attached.

I like Steve's idea of forming this group and hope educators and parents will really take an honest look at this incredibly important issue in our state and country. We MUST focus more on education at the K-12 AND higher ed levels if we are to be competitive in the worldwide economy.

11:58 PM  
Blogger Bradley Ross said...

Jon, I think you missed the satire in the first anonymous comment.

Steve, thanks for this post. I hope you'll post some results from your conversation group here. Even better would be some video from the group posted on Politicopia.

7:33 PM  
OpenID Matt said...

So if we throw enough money at education then eventually all graduating seniors will become Einsteins and Hawkings. Right?

I agree that public schools could use some more money, especially for teacher salaries, but that does not and will not fix the issue Rep. Urquhart so accurately expressed here; what to do about low performance/results in education? Funding is one issue, but hardly the catch-all solution to performance. Here's a few more arrows for the "Be Smart" quiver:

1. Vouchers - if it will help some kids, then let it help those kids. HELP is the key word here. Why does it matter if tax dollars go back to the private schools/sector? That is where it came from in the first place!
2. Charters - more funding, support, research and development of charter schools. Same as above, if it works for some kids, let it work for them.
3. Virtual Schools - whether charter or state/district operated, virtual schools can provide the small/remote schools with access to state of the art, advanced placement, IB and other courses previously not available. However, I don't think any one can get a sound, comprehensive, rigorous education from a full-time virtual school. I think it should only supplement other courses.

2:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Steve,

My openion funding play a role but it is secondary, parents role is very very important, how much time they are spending with the kids to teach and encourage them to read more books. Also the state has to come up with very good website which has all the workbooks, with day by day schedule in the PDF formats, so that parents can go online and print it and let the kids do their work as for the schedule. My son is going to XXXXX school hs has completed only 40% of the work in the text books they provided and 100% of the work they have assigned to him, so the teachers are either missing something or not motivated to improve the education system.

This country is highly innovative so far the basic pillar is math, science and creativity. Kids are loosing interest on math and science because we are not encouraging them improve these skills at early age, automatically their drive is in different direction and in near future we will not see great scientists or innovators in these fields to compete with the other countries like (Russia, china, India ....). Please look deeply into the future and take appropriate action.

11:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We need to remember that in the United States and in Utah we are required to teach ALL students. In other countries, especially those that people like to compare us to, the education system tests students in 8th grade and determines whether they will be attending a college-bound school or a trade school. All of the comparison data is from the college-bound school children, which makes it an inaccurate comparison.

11:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Matt-
all three of those ideas are not only dumb but also are attribuing factors to the lack of money in public schools; they would only make the problem worse.

3:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home